Effect of Modulated Water Application on Shoot Size, Flower and Fruit Production in Abelmoschus esculentus L. (Moench)

Main Article Content

Ofobeze, Tochukwu Nosike
Chukwubeze Chiduziem Patience
Uba, Chibuzo Christain


Aim: To study the effect of modulated water application on size of above ground structures of Abelmoschus esculentus L. (Moench) and its productivity.

Objective: The objective is to find out which of the four options of modulated water application gave earliness to maturity, size and production for the plant.

Methodology: This work was carried out in a screen house of the department of Botany, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka. Seeds of Abelmoschus esculentus, of a local variety (Jokoson) were planted in plastic pots of 30 cm diameter, holding 17 kg of loam soil. The post received water by sprinkling to the tune of 3400 ml after considering the drainage upper limit (DUP) of the soil. The plants received NPK 20:10:10 fertilizer. Modulated water stress treatment was given. Each treatment has five replicate and performed in a complete randomized design (CRD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on collected data was performed using SPSS version 20.

Results: Morphological parameter like leaf area and plant height was observed under the options of the modulated water application treatment. Mean Leaf area of plants observed at weekly interval showed that treatments affected the growth pattern and anthesis. The result at 49 days after germination gave 1034.35 cm2, 805.26 cm2, 900.35 cm2 and 715.97 cm2, for T1, T2, T3, and T4 respectively and was significant at p≤0.05. Consequently, the mean number of flowers produced per plant at 49 DAG (Days After Germination) gave 6.00, 4.00, 4.00 and 4.00 for T1, T2, T3, and T4. Also the mean number of flowers which developed into fruits was obtained as 6.00, 4.00, 3.00 and 2.00 for T1, T2, T3, and T4. Correlations factor between the flower productions against fruit production was significant at p≤0.01 (2-tailed) for T3 and T4.

Conclusion: Regular water application at two-day interval throughout (T1) to the crop plant gave earliness, higher number of fruit and vegetative production than the interrupted water application at some developmental stage of the plant.

Anthesis, Days after Germination (DAG), plasticity, flower, fruit, Water Use Efficiency (WUE).

Article Details

How to Cite
Nosike, O. T., Patience, C. C., & Christain, U. C. (2019). Effect of Modulated Water Application on Shoot Size, Flower and Fruit Production in Abelmoschus esculentus L. (Moench). Asian Journal of Research in Botany, 2(3), 1-8. Retrieved from http://journalajrib.com/index.php/AJRIB/article/view/30071
Original Research Article


Truskina J, Vernoux T. The growth of a stable stationary structure: coordinating cell behavior and patterning at the shoot apical meristem. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2018;41:83-88.

Castro CD, Leite RDC. Main aspects of sunflower production in Brazil. Embrapa Soja-Artigo Em Periódico Indexado (ALICE); 2018.

Erwin J. (). Factors affecting flowering in ornamental plants. In Flower Breeding and Genetics. Springer, Dordrecht. 2007;7-48.

Murthy KSR, Kondamudi R, Chalapathi Rao PV, Pullaiah T. In vitro flowering-A review. J Agric Technol. 2012;8(5):1517-1536

Andrés F, Coupland G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2012;13(9): 627.

Levitt J. Plant responses to environmental stress. New York: Academic Press. 1980;2.

Nielsen DC, Vigil MF. Soil water extraction for several dryland crops. Agronomy Journal; 2018.

Gepstein S. Photosynthesis. In: LD Nooden, AC Leopold, eds. Senescence and Aging in Plants. In: Pessarakli M, ed, Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology, Marcel Dekker Inc. 1988;117.

Pessarakli M. (ed.). Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. 2nd ed. Marcel Decker, New York. 2001;117.

McDaniel CN, Harntuentt LK, Sangrey KA. Flowering as metamorphosis; Two sequential signals regulate floral initiation in Lolium temulentum. Development. 1996;122:3661-3668.

Poething RS. Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science. 1990;250:923-930.

Kubi-Tetteh E. Response of Cacao (Theobroma cacao) seedlings to different soil amendment ratios and watering regimes. Doctoral Dissertation; 2015.

Zlatev Z, Lidon FC. An overview on drought induced changes in plant growth, water relationsand photosynthesis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2012;57-72.

Beebe S, Rao I, Blair M, Acosta J. Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Frontiers in Physiology. 2013;4: 35.

Acosta-Gallegos JA. Selection of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes with enhanced drought toleranceand biological nitrogen fixation. Ph.D dissertation (Diss Abstract 88-24816). Michigan State University, EastLansing, MI. In Handbook of plant and crop Physiology. Marcel Dekker Inc. 1988;625.

Comas L, Becker S, Cruz VMV, Byrne PF, Dierig DA. Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in plant science. 2013;4:442.

Viets GJ. In: Pessarakli M, ed, Handbook of plant and crop physiology. Marcel Dekker Inc. 1967;643.

Rao ACS, Ramamoorthy B. In: Pessarakli M, ed, Handbook of plant and crop physiology, Marcel Dekker Inc. 1980;643.

Comas L, Becker S, Cruz VMV, Byrne PF, Dierig DA. Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013;4:442.

Norman JC. Tropical Vegetable Crops. Arthur H. Strockwell Ltd. Britain. 1992;252.

Nwalieji HU, Okeke MN, Uzuegbunam CO. Comparative profit analysis of dry and rainy season okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) production among women of Anyamelum Local Government Area of Anambra State; 2015.