Flora, Density and Efficiency of Weed Affected Sugarcane Controlled by Chemical Herbicides

I. E. Abu Alama

Sugarcane Research Center, Guneid, Sudan.

S. O. Yagoub *

Weed Science Center, College of Agricultural Studies, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum North, Sudan.

M. Abdelhalim

Sugarcane Research Center, Guneid, Sudan.

M. A. Hadad

Weed Science Center, College of Agricultural Studies, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum North, Sudan.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: The aims of the study was to determine the weed flora, weed density and weed control efficiency of different weed types affect sugarcane as plant cane crop.

Study Design: Experimental design of the study was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four replication.

Place and Duration of Study: A field experiment was conducted in two experimental sites in Sugarcane Research Center Farm at Guneid, Sudan during 2019-2020.

Methodology: Four chemical herbicides treatments; W1: un weeded (control), W2: Ametryne (3.8 L/ha) + Atrazine (3.8 L/ha), W3: Atrazine (3.0 L/ha)+Pendimethalin (2.9 L/ha) and W4: and Metribuzin (5.21 L/ha)+Pendimethalin (3.57 L/ha) was used for sugarcane. A knapsack sprayer (CP3) with a capacity of 16 liter was used for applying herbicides. Weed flora, density and efficiency was determined in the field.

Results: The results related to weed flora for plant cane crop in the two different experimental sites identified about 15 weed species classified into two categories; grasses and broad-leaves weed with the dominance of broad leaves weed. The total average number of weed in the un weeded plots in the two different experimental sites ranged between 13 to 17 % of the total weeds were grasses and the rest were broad-leaved weeds which ranged between 87 to 83 %.  The experiment revealed that  treatment W4: (Metribuzin 5.21 l/ha + Pendimethalin 3.57 l/ha) recorded significant value  at (p<0.05)  with the lowest weed density, and the highest weed control efficiency percent compared to the other chemical herbicide’s treatments and the control in plant cane crop in the two different experimental sites.

Conclusion:  the findings of the study showed that there was about 15 weed species classified into two categories; grasses the rest were broad-leaved weed.The broad leaves weed were dominance over grass weed. The treatment W4: (Metribuzin 5.21 l/ha + Pendimethalin 3.57 l/ha) was the best for weed control in sugarcane in the two sites.

Keywords: Chemical herbicides, Sudan, sugarcane, Saccharum officinarum L, weed density, weed flora


How to Cite

Alama, I. E. Abu, S. O. Yagoub, M. Abdelhalim, and M. A. Hadad. 2023. “Flora, Density and Efficiency of Weed Affected Sugarcane Controlled by Chemical Herbicides”. Asian Journal of Research in Botany 6 (1):37-45. https://journalajrib.com/index.php/AJRIB/article/view/172.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kundu R, Mondal M. Garai, S. Poddar, R. and Banerjee, S. Efficacy of herbicides against broad-spectrum weed floras and their effect on nontarget soil micro-organisms and productivity in sugarcane (Saccharum sp). Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2020;39(2):23-32.

Makkawi AA. Evaluation of some preemergence herbicides mixtures for weed control in sugarcane. Paper presented to the 84th Meeting of the National Pests and Diseases Committee .Agricultural Research Crop. Medani, Sudan; 2011.

Singh R, Shyam R, Bhatnagar A, Singh VK, Kumar J. Bio-efficacy of Herbicides applied at 2 to 4 leaf stage of weeds in sugarcane after second Intercultural. Indian J Weed Sci. 2011;43(3&4):145-8.

Khan B, Jama M, Azim H. Effect of weeds on cane yield and content of sugarcane. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research. 2004;10(1-2):47-50.

Kaur N, Bhullar MS, Gill G. Weed management in sugarcane-canola intercropping systems in northern India. Field Crops Res. 2016;188:1-9.

Shehata SA, Abozien HF, AbdEl-Gawad KF, Elkhawaga FA. Safe weed Management methods as alternative to synthetic herbicides in potato. Res J Pharm Biol.Sci. 2017;8(2):1148-56.

Chikoye D, Udensi E, Udensi A, Fontem L. Evaluation of a new formulation of atrazineand metolachlor mixture for weed control inmaize in Nigeria. Crop Prot. 2005;24:1016-20.

Almubarak NF, Srivastava TK. Effect of weed control methods on growth and development of weeds in sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Fields. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2015;1(3):49-54.

Hussain A, Khakwania A, Tanveer A, Khana EA, Mohammad S. Optimizing efficacy of acetochlor + atrazine and dicamba at various doses to manage Conyza stricta L. in sugarcane. Planta Daninha. 2020;38:e020220829.

Da Silva PV, Viana HRM, Monquero PA. Ribeiro NM, Neto WP, Inacio EM, Christoffoleti PJ. de Carvalho Dias. R. Influence of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) straw on weed germination contro. lFCA UNCuyo. 2021;53(1): 220-33.

Souza JR, Perecin D, Azania CAM, Schiavetto AR, Pizzo IV, Candido LS. Tolerance of sugarcane cultivars to herbicides applied in postemergence. Bragantia. 2009;68(4):941-51.

Hamada AA. Investigation on the germination requirements and competitive effects of weed- Acase study of the Rahad Scheme – the Sudan – Plits. 1992;1(10): 155.

Abdel Halim M, Wani P, Abbas IA. Evaluation of Ametrinco 50% SC (new formulation of ametryne) in mixture with Atrazico 50% SC (new formulation of atrazine) for preemergence weed control in sugarcane. Proceeding of the 84th Meeting of the National Pests and Diseases Committee, ARC, Dr. Yassin Idris Conference Hall. Wad Madani, Sudan; 2011.

Hajebi A, Das TK, Arora A, Singh SB, Hajebi F. Herbicides tank-mixes effects on weeds and productivity and profitability of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) under conventional and zero tillage. Sci Hortic. 2016;198:191-6.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed, A Wily Inter. Sci. publication. New York: John Wiley & Son; 1984.

Waghmare PR, Khandare RV, Jeon BH, Govindwar SP. Enzymatic hydrolysis of biologically pretreated sorghum husk for bioethanol production. Biofuel Res J. 2018;5(3):846-53.

Lal M, Singh AK. Multiple ratooning for high cane productivity and sugar recovery. In: Proceedings of the national seminar on varietal planning for improving productivity and sugar recovery in sugarcane held at G.B.P.U.A. & T. Pantnagar. 2008;14(15): 62-8.

Pratap T, Singh R, Pal R, Yadaw S, Singh V. Integrated weed management Studies in sugarcane ratoon. Indian J Weed Sci. 2013;45(4):257-9.

Mishra MM, Mishra SS, Mishra KN, Nayak PK. Effect of different weed Management practices on yield of sugarcane ratoon. Indian J Sugarcane Technol. 2012; 27(2):76-8.

Singh R, Kumar J, Kumar P, Pratap T, Singh VK, Pal R, Panwar S. Effect of integrated weed management practices on sugarcane ratoon and associated weeds. Indian J. Weed Science 2012;44: 144-146.

El-Shafai AMA, Fakkar AAO, Bekheet MA. Effect of row spacing and some weed control treatments on growth, quality and yield of sugarcane. Int J Acad Res. 2010; 2(4):297-305.